Brigalow Corporation (of the State of Qld) originated in the old Qld crowns lands act and came about through the Qld government borrowing from the federal government funds to develop what was termed the “Brigalow Belt” (about 4 mil acres) out from Rockhampton during the 1960’s.
The old crowns lands act (Qld) has now been converted to the “Land Act 1994 (Qld)” and this is where you can find the “Brigalow Corporation” today. In essence the government of Qld has moved all the crowns land AND all crown land that was sold (fee simple) into the Brigalow Corporation through the Land Act, Land Title Act, Property Law Act, etc, etc, etc.
This was achieved through a series of Constitutional changes that were “Reprinted” into and out of the 1867 Constitution commencing in 1996 with “Reprint no 1” and ending with the introduction of the 2001 Queensland Constitution Act (whole new constitution) all without a referendum of any sort.
Once the necessary changes to the “Engine” have been made then moving or amending all subordinate laws is very simple, just reprint them starting with the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 (Qld).
The “Brigalow Corporation” in not Listed as a “Public” company on the Stock Exchange, it is an “Exempt Public Authority” which is found by definition at s9 and 5A of the Corporations Act 2001 (C’wth) (in right of the crown), except there is no “Crown” in Qld just “the State”.
The term “The State” or as written in most the modern Qld statutes, “This Act binds the state” is reminiscent of Stalin’s Russia where everything was the property of “The State”.
Showing posts with label Brigalow Corporation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Brigalow Corporation. Show all posts
Monday, December 14, 2009
Pt 7. The QLD Constitution 2001 & the Removal of all Ownership Rights in QLD
What is Behind This
It is quite clear that those who have been put in power by the sovereign people of the State have, since 1992 when the original Acts were being framed, had a full intention in time, to bring about their own personal agendas, regardless of the wishes of the sovereign people who have, in good and open faith and intention, by secret ballot at elections, voted these people into positions of power and of trust and who must swear or affirm an oath of allegiance to Her Majesty that they will uphold Her laws for the benefit of the people of the State of QLD. That power has turned from the power granted by the people to the Legislative Assembly to make laws for 'peace welfare and good government' on behalf of the sovereign people of QLD using funds from taxes paid by the citizens of QLD and all of Australia, into a totalitarian system of Government, whereby we the people are subject to the corporation Government of the State.
The ramifications caused by these actions carried out over a long period of time by the Members of the body politic dating back as far as 1992 are so vast and wide spread it will take a long time to remedy and repair the whole system of government in QLD. The Parliament can make any laws they wish but I do not believe that under a democratic system of Government they are elected to Parliament to make draconian laws which remove the rights of the sovereign people to their use of their land without fair and just compensation.
Under the Constitution of Queensland 2001, by the removal of common law in the State of QLD, the public officials of this State can acquire an interest in private registered land without compensation, for the benefit of the State Government corporation. This also includes the property owned now and in the future as the sovereign people are in fact " an individual and a corporation" and therefore subject to the corporation Government of the State of QLD.
It is very clear from the time line of events that this was a well-planned manoeuvre to remove QLD from the Federation of Australia and through that action from the protection of the Australian Constitution and Common Law & Equity.
The former Premier said in the Second Reading Speech for the constitution, 'we all look forward to the day when we are a republic'. The people of the Commonwealth of Australia at referendum in 1999 voted against a republic but wished to retain the present system of Government with a clear separation of powers under common law and for the Commonwealth of Australia to remain exactly the same with a combined Federation of States as was created in 1901.
Mr Beattie also stated –
"But this Act is much more it is the fundamental law of QLD that underpins our system of government.
The entities it provides for include this Parliament, the Supreme and District Courts of this State and the system of local government that we know in QLD. The office holders under this Act include the Governor of QLD, the Ministers of the Crown and the judges of the Supreme and District Courts. This law is of supreme importance."
Further in the speech, the Premier stated "Our entity as a Sovereign State, the democratic ideals on which our State is built, rest on our Constitution".
Pt 6. The QLD Constitution 2001 & the Removal of all Ownership Rights in QLD
Assets of the Corporation
As the corporation of QLD, when it was formed, had no assets, it had to acquire assets if they wished to borrow. Under the Queensland Government (Land Holding) Amendment Act 1992, they immediately took all the Crown land and estates in fee simple registered under the Property Law Act 1974 as equity for the corporation without compensation to the registered owners of the property whether they live in QLD or anywhere else and converted that property for their own use, contrary to Chapter 7 of the Criminal Code Act 1995(C'wth) - The proper administration of Government.
The QLD Government Land Holding Amendment Act 1992 was reprinted into law through the Parliament of Queensland Act 2001, whereupon all Crown land, assets and infrastructure on that land including schools, hospitals, roads, etc became subject to and responsible to the Ministers of the State of QLD as cited at Chapter III of the Queensland Constitution 2001.
The Acts Interpretation (State Commercial Activities) Act 1994 amended the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 to define "the State" to mean the Executive government of the State of QLD. Under the provisions of this Act, "the State" may carry out commercial activities 'without further statutory authority' and 'without prior appropriation from the public accounts' {s47C.(3)} Section 47C. defines 'commercial activities to include 'commercial activities that are not within the ordinary functions of the State' and these functions may be delegated by a Minister to an officer of the State who may subdelegate delegated powers to another officer of the State. An 'officer of the State means a chief executive, or employee of the public sector or an officer of the public service'.
Under the Lands Legislation Amendment Act No. 64 of 1992 © The State of QLD and mfurther now in the corporation of the State known as the Brigalow Corporation and further by amendment of the Constitution Act 1867 Reprint 2A which clearly defines that any estate or interest in the land to be acquired from any other person, the definition of land clearly does not include any estate, therefore the only land held has been transferred from the Real Property Acts of 1861; 1877; 1952 and 1956 into the Land Title Act 1994(Qld) Reprint 7 ©State of QLD 2003 and you hold your land in a statutory title only, without any further element of tenure of the Crown and the Courts are inside the Government and subject to the rules of the Court as found in the Statutory Instruments Act 1992© The State of QLD.
Recent newspaper articles have shown the next steps in this “legal land theft”. The QLD Government plans to determine Land valuation via the Improved Capital Value, which would allow their asset base to rise extraordinarily, as well as increase the amount of rates to the land owners.
A second article states regarding the QLD Urban Land Development ……..
“Both the authority and a developer will be able to write their own by-laws, open and close roads, levy their own rates, enter buildings without a warrant and cut councils out of the planning process in designated areas, all without being elected.”
As the corporation of QLD, when it was formed, had no assets, it had to acquire assets if they wished to borrow. Under the Queensland Government (Land Holding) Amendment Act 1992, they immediately took all the Crown land and estates in fee simple registered under the Property Law Act 1974 as equity for the corporation without compensation to the registered owners of the property whether they live in QLD or anywhere else and converted that property for their own use, contrary to Chapter 7 of the Criminal Code Act 1995(C'wth) - The proper administration of Government.
The QLD Government Land Holding Amendment Act 1992 was reprinted into law through the Parliament of Queensland Act 2001, whereupon all Crown land, assets and infrastructure on that land including schools, hospitals, roads, etc became subject to and responsible to the Ministers of the State of QLD as cited at Chapter III of the Queensland Constitution 2001.
The Acts Interpretation (State Commercial Activities) Act 1994 amended the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 to define "the State" to mean the Executive government of the State of QLD. Under the provisions of this Act, "the State" may carry out commercial activities 'without further statutory authority' and 'without prior appropriation from the public accounts' {s47C.(3)} Section 47C. defines 'commercial activities to include 'commercial activities that are not within the ordinary functions of the State' and these functions may be delegated by a Minister to an officer of the State who may subdelegate delegated powers to another officer of the State. An 'officer of the State means a chief executive, or employee of the public sector or an officer of the public service'.
Under the Lands Legislation Amendment Act No. 64 of 1992 © The State of QLD and mfurther now in the corporation of the State known as the Brigalow Corporation and further by amendment of the Constitution Act 1867 Reprint 2A which clearly defines that any estate or interest in the land to be acquired from any other person, the definition of land clearly does not include any estate, therefore the only land held has been transferred from the Real Property Acts of 1861; 1877; 1952 and 1956 into the Land Title Act 1994(Qld) Reprint 7 ©State of QLD 2003 and you hold your land in a statutory title only, without any further element of tenure of the Crown and the Courts are inside the Government and subject to the rules of the Court as found in the Statutory Instruments Act 1992© The State of QLD.
Recent newspaper articles have shown the next steps in this “legal land theft”. The QLD Government plans to determine Land valuation via the Improved Capital Value, which would allow their asset base to rise extraordinarily, as well as increase the amount of rates to the land owners.
A second article states regarding the QLD Urban Land Development ……..
“Both the authority and a developer will be able to write their own by-laws, open and close roads, levy their own rates, enter buildings without a warrant and cut councils out of the planning process in designated areas, all without being elected.”
Pt 5. The QLD Constitution 2001 & the Removal of all Ownership Rights in QLD
Sovereign People
We are all subjects of Her Majesty under section 117 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
The Parliament of QLD does not recognize the rights of the sovereign people inside the State of QLD.
What now happens to people who have been prosecuted, fined, imprisoned etc. under the civil law of QLD, which does not exist elsewhere in the Commonwealth of Australia. The people of QLD are still, under section 117 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, subjects of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and protected by Her laws as there has been no referendum under section 128 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act to allow the separation of QLD from the Commonwealth of Australia.
Those of you who hold a Deed of Grant in fee simple in QLD, now only hold a statutory title, and that title is upheld by the civil laws of the Supreme and District Courts of the corporate Government of QLD and the Judges of the Supreme and District Courts who are inside the Government. Your common law estate in fee simple is now held by the corporate Government of the Sovereign State of QLD.
Under the definitions in the Acts Interpretation 1954(Qld), section 36, the definition of 'property' and 'land', the State of QLD now owns all your property, which includes money, real and personal property from the past and any future property which includes your will.
I refer to the definition of 'land' under section 22 - Meaning of certain words (aa) 'individual' and (c) 'land' of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901(C'wth) and the definition of 'property' in section 130.1 of the Criminal Code Act 1995(C'wth) The Acts Interpretation Act 1954(Qld) is ultra vires to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, Criminal Code Act 1995(C'wth), Chapter 7 - The proper administration of Government; the Acts Interpretation Act 1901(C'wth).
The Acts Interpretation Act 1954(Q) defines property both present and future, owned by
you as an 'individual and a corporation' as subject to a statutory instrument only and that statutory instrument is not only applicable to your land, but all property that you, as a person in QLD now own, as opposed to the previous common law indefeasible deed of grant in fee simple. All land, including private land held previously in the common law estate of inheritance in fee simple by private individuals, is now held by the corporation of the State of QLD known as the Brigalow Corporation.
The only tenure that any financial institutions hold in land in QLD today, even though they may believe they hold an estate in fee simple, is in fact held by the corporation of the State, the Brigalow Corporation and is now the full property of the State. The lending institutions now only hold a statutory title and an interest only in the land by virtue of the Statutory Instruments Act 1992 under which the rules of the Supreme and District Courts are found under section 12 of that Act.
The owners of that property taken by the corporation can only hope that the corporation has not used your real property as an asset to borrow funds for the corporation for whatever purpose. If the independent State corporation fails or borrowing is too extensive, it will again be the sovereign people who will bear the financial consequences.
Your Deed of Grant in fee simple is now a statutory title only, and that title is upheld by the civil laws of the Supreme and District Courts of the corporate Government of QLD and the Judges of the Supreme and District Courts who are inside the Government
Your land is now held by the Government of QLD in the Brigalow Corporation with no compensation paid to you for that acquisition. For “Even though the King may not enter” (Plenty v. Dillon [1991] HCA 5; 171 CLR 635 F.C. 91/004 (7 March 1991) the QLD Government and the delegated authorities thereof can, without fine or legal interference.
To have QLD become an independent Sovereign State and to remove the common
law, set up statutory civil law and have Queensland not recognize the Commonwealth of
Australia Constitution Act but only that Act from section 9 onwards, a full referendum
would have been required of the people of the Commonwealth of Australia to enact,
validly, that QLD, from 29th January 1999 was now independent of the Commonwealth of
Australia and a State in its own right.
That did not happen.
In the Second Reading Speech for the Constitution the Premier stated that the Constitution would be 'broadly accessible' to the people of QLD. Considering that this Act has effectively removed all common law property rights from the people of QLD it should, one would reasonably assume, have been put to a referendum of the people.
The sovereign people of the Commonwealth of Australia have never been required at a referendum by virtue of section 128 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia to vote to allow "the State" of QLD to fracture the Commonwealth and become an independent sovereign state.
We are all subjects of Her Majesty under section 117 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
The Parliament of QLD does not recognize the rights of the sovereign people inside the State of QLD.
What now happens to people who have been prosecuted, fined, imprisoned etc. under the civil law of QLD, which does not exist elsewhere in the Commonwealth of Australia. The people of QLD are still, under section 117 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, subjects of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and protected by Her laws as there has been no referendum under section 128 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act to allow the separation of QLD from the Commonwealth of Australia.
Those of you who hold a Deed of Grant in fee simple in QLD, now only hold a statutory title, and that title is upheld by the civil laws of the Supreme and District Courts of the corporate Government of QLD and the Judges of the Supreme and District Courts who are inside the Government. Your common law estate in fee simple is now held by the corporate Government of the Sovereign State of QLD.
Under the definitions in the Acts Interpretation 1954(Qld), section 36, the definition of 'property' and 'land', the State of QLD now owns all your property, which includes money, real and personal property from the past and any future property which includes your will.
I refer to the definition of 'land' under section 22 - Meaning of certain words (aa) 'individual' and (c) 'land' of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901(C'wth) and the definition of 'property' in section 130.1 of the Criminal Code Act 1995(C'wth) The Acts Interpretation Act 1954(Qld) is ultra vires to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, Criminal Code Act 1995(C'wth), Chapter 7 - The proper administration of Government; the Acts Interpretation Act 1901(C'wth).
The Acts Interpretation Act 1954(Q) defines property both present and future, owned by
you as an 'individual and a corporation' as subject to a statutory instrument only and that statutory instrument is not only applicable to your land, but all property that you, as a person in QLD now own, as opposed to the previous common law indefeasible deed of grant in fee simple. All land, including private land held previously in the common law estate of inheritance in fee simple by private individuals, is now held by the corporation of the State of QLD known as the Brigalow Corporation.
The only tenure that any financial institutions hold in land in QLD today, even though they may believe they hold an estate in fee simple, is in fact held by the corporation of the State, the Brigalow Corporation and is now the full property of the State. The lending institutions now only hold a statutory title and an interest only in the land by virtue of the Statutory Instruments Act 1992 under which the rules of the Supreme and District Courts are found under section 12 of that Act.
The owners of that property taken by the corporation can only hope that the corporation has not used your real property as an asset to borrow funds for the corporation for whatever purpose. If the independent State corporation fails or borrowing is too extensive, it will again be the sovereign people who will bear the financial consequences.
Your Deed of Grant in fee simple is now a statutory title only, and that title is upheld by the civil laws of the Supreme and District Courts of the corporate Government of QLD and the Judges of the Supreme and District Courts who are inside the Government
Your land is now held by the Government of QLD in the Brigalow Corporation with no compensation paid to you for that acquisition. For “Even though the King may not enter” (Plenty v. Dillon [1991] HCA 5; 171 CLR 635 F.C. 91/004 (7 March 1991) the QLD Government and the delegated authorities thereof can, without fine or legal interference.
To have QLD become an independent Sovereign State and to remove the common
law, set up statutory civil law and have Queensland not recognize the Commonwealth of
Australia Constitution Act but only that Act from section 9 onwards, a full referendum
would have been required of the people of the Commonwealth of Australia to enact,
validly, that QLD, from 29th January 1999 was now independent of the Commonwealth of
Australia and a State in its own right.
That did not happen.
In the Second Reading Speech for the Constitution the Premier stated that the Constitution would be 'broadly accessible' to the people of QLD. Considering that this Act has effectively removed all common law property rights from the people of QLD it should, one would reasonably assume, have been put to a referendum of the people.
The sovereign people of the Commonwealth of Australia have never been required at a referendum by virtue of section 128 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia to vote to allow "the State" of QLD to fracture the Commonwealth and become an independent sovereign state.
Pt 2. The QLD Constitution 2001 & the Removal of all Ownership Rights in QLD
The Brigalow Corporation (of the State of Qld) originated in the old Qld Crowns Lands Act and came about through the Qld Government borrowing from the Federal Government funds to develop what was termed the “Brigalow Belt” (about 4 mil acres) out from Rockhampton during the 1960’s.
The old Crowns Lands Act (Qld) has now been converted to the “Land Act 1994 (Qld)” and this is where you can find the “Brigalow Corporation” today. In essence the government of Qld has moved all the crowns land AND all crown land that was sold (fee simple) into the Brigalow Corporation through the Land Act, Land Title Act, Property Law Act, etc, etc, etc.
The “Brigalow Corporation” in not Listed as a “Public” company on the Stock Exchange, it is an “Exempt Public Authority” which is found by definition at s9 and 5A of the Corporations Act 2001 (C’wth) (in right of the crown), except there is no “Crown” in Qld just “the State”. The term “The State” or as written in most modern Qld statutes, “This Act binds the state”.
It is quite clear in the Second Reading Speech by Premier Beattie, that at the time the Legislative Assembly voted for the passing of the Parliament of Queensland Bill 2001 and the Constitution of Queensland 2001, they were allowing the use of Acts which had been framed but had not been passed by the Legislative Assembly and were, in fact, adjourned sine die going back to 1991. Sine die meaning to be Adjourned without giving any future date of meeting or hearing.
Those Acts were proclaimed on 7 June 2002 and then reprinted as law of that Parliament.
By the passing of these Acts by the Parliament of QLD, the subject citizens of Her Majesty have suffered the loss of their judicial relief at common law and all those rights which are originally entrenched in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act at sects 109, 107, 108, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, Chapter II, III, sects 75 and 76.
The Corporations (Q) Act 1990 (Q) Reprint No 3, was reprinted as in force immediately before 15 July 2001 ©State of Q 2006.
At this time, the State of QLD became a Corporation Government. Under the definition of ‘person’ in the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (C’wth), section 22 (1)(a) expressions used to denote persons include a body politic or corporate as well as an individual.
The Acts Interpretation Act 1954 (Q) defines a person as an ‘individual and a corporation’ and as such the once Sovereign People are now subject to the corporate government of the State of QLD and as such are ‘chattels’ of the State of QLD Corporation.
I refer to the following Acts - the Reprints Act 1992, the Statutory Instruments Act 1992, the Legislative Standards Act 1992. These Acts were used in conjunction with the Constitution of QLD 2001, section 92 to create the corporation Government of the State and then further to repeal those Acts under section 95 of that Constitution. Those Acts moved back in time, one may say like the Tardis, reprinting, removing the Crown out of all Acts as far back as the Magna Carta then reprinting back to the Australia Acts (Requests) Act 1985 and removing all the positions as cited in that Act. The only part of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act which is recognized by QLD is the Commonwealth Constitution commencing at section 9. The sections of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act which are not recognized includes the High Court and the Federal Court.
By using the Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 section 12 in conjunction with the other three State Acts, the Acts reprinted QLD into a corporate State. In conjunction with the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 section 15DA(2) which allowed for the automatic commencement and assent of any Act that had been laying dormant for a period of twelve months, Acts which were framed to create the corporate State of QLD in 1992, 1993 and 1994 were reprinted by the Reprints Act 1992 which is under the Department of the Premier.
The elected Members of the sovereign people of the State of QLD have, since 29th January 1999 taken it upon themselves, (contrary to the Criminal Code Act 1995(C'wth) to which they are all subject under Chapter 7 - The proper administration of Government), to create for themselves, under the Constitution of QLD 2001, a corporation Government in which the sovereign people of QLD and their property are mere chattels of the State. This surely is a breach of the trust and faith which the electors of QLD placed in their elected members to uphold and respect the laws of the Commonwealth.
The State of Queensland Australia is registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commissions under No. 0001244818.
The Queensland Treasury Corp is registered under No. 0000852555
I have copies of their Annual Report for Foreign Governments & Political Subdivisions including the Queensland Treasury Corporation’s 2006-07 Indicative borrowing program Update.
I also have the Queensland State Accounts December 2006 which carries gross private information.
The old Crowns Lands Act (Qld) has now been converted to the “Land Act 1994 (Qld)” and this is where you can find the “Brigalow Corporation” today. In essence the government of Qld has moved all the crowns land AND all crown land that was sold (fee simple) into the Brigalow Corporation through the Land Act, Land Title Act, Property Law Act, etc, etc, etc.
The “Brigalow Corporation” in not Listed as a “Public” company on the Stock Exchange, it is an “Exempt Public Authority” which is found by definition at s9 and 5A of the Corporations Act 2001 (C’wth) (in right of the crown), except there is no “Crown” in Qld just “the State”. The term “The State” or as written in most modern Qld statutes, “This Act binds the state”.
It is quite clear in the Second Reading Speech by Premier Beattie, that at the time the Legislative Assembly voted for the passing of the Parliament of Queensland Bill 2001 and the Constitution of Queensland 2001, they were allowing the use of Acts which had been framed but had not been passed by the Legislative Assembly and were, in fact, adjourned sine die going back to 1991. Sine die meaning to be Adjourned without giving any future date of meeting or hearing.
Those Acts were proclaimed on 7 June 2002 and then reprinted as law of that Parliament.
By the passing of these Acts by the Parliament of QLD, the subject citizens of Her Majesty have suffered the loss of their judicial relief at common law and all those rights which are originally entrenched in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act at sects 109, 107, 108, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, Chapter II, III, sects 75 and 76.
The Corporations (Q) Act 1990 (Q) Reprint No 3, was reprinted as in force immediately before 15 July 2001 ©State of Q 2006.
At this time, the State of QLD became a Corporation Government. Under the definition of ‘person’ in the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (C’wth), section 22 (1)(a) expressions used to denote persons include a body politic or corporate as well as an individual.
The Acts Interpretation Act 1954 (Q) defines a person as an ‘individual and a corporation’ and as such the once Sovereign People are now subject to the corporate government of the State of QLD and as such are ‘chattels’ of the State of QLD Corporation.
I refer to the following Acts - the Reprints Act 1992, the Statutory Instruments Act 1992, the Legislative Standards Act 1992. These Acts were used in conjunction with the Constitution of QLD 2001, section 92 to create the corporation Government of the State and then further to repeal those Acts under section 95 of that Constitution. Those Acts moved back in time, one may say like the Tardis, reprinting, removing the Crown out of all Acts as far back as the Magna Carta then reprinting back to the Australia Acts (Requests) Act 1985 and removing all the positions as cited in that Act. The only part of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act which is recognized by QLD is the Commonwealth Constitution commencing at section 9. The sections of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act which are not recognized includes the High Court and the Federal Court.
By using the Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 section 12 in conjunction with the other three State Acts, the Acts reprinted QLD into a corporate State. In conjunction with the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 section 15DA(2) which allowed for the automatic commencement and assent of any Act that had been laying dormant for a period of twelve months, Acts which were framed to create the corporate State of QLD in 1992, 1993 and 1994 were reprinted by the Reprints Act 1992 which is under the Department of the Premier.
The elected Members of the sovereign people of the State of QLD have, since 29th January 1999 taken it upon themselves, (contrary to the Criminal Code Act 1995(C'wth) to which they are all subject under Chapter 7 - The proper administration of Government), to create for themselves, under the Constitution of QLD 2001, a corporation Government in which the sovereign people of QLD and their property are mere chattels of the State. This surely is a breach of the trust and faith which the electors of QLD placed in their elected members to uphold and respect the laws of the Commonwealth.
The State of Queensland Australia is registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commissions under No. 0001244818.
The Queensland Treasury Corp is registered under No. 0000852555
I have copies of their Annual Report for Foreign Governments & Political Subdivisions including the Queensland Treasury Corporation’s 2006-07 Indicative borrowing program Update.
I also have the Queensland State Accounts December 2006 which carries gross private information.
Pt 1. The QLD Constitution 2001 & the Removal of all Ownership Rights in QLD
In order to bring about the structure now known as the State of QLD / Brigalow Corporation a long process of legal manipulation was instituted.
As the aim was to remove QLD from the Australian Federation, it was necessary to remove it back to the original QLD Constitution 1867, prior to Federation and make sure that Constitution was able to carry the intended results.
Consequently, this Constitution was reprinted but withheld for a date to be fixed, with 114 Changes, 131 Additions and 116 Deletions.
The most relevant change initially was the addition of over 14 sections regarding the expansion of the role of Parliamentary Secretary.
During the early 1990’s all major laws were reprinted, but held over for a fixed date.
On approx the 29 January 1998, the leader of the National Party placed on the table in Parliament, a document seeking to move the Governor of the State of QLD, into the Constitution Act 1867 as a parliamentary secretary and a public official. This was done under the Imperial Acts Application Act 1954 section 15DA.
This document was not challenged by any member of any party or any independent member of the QLD Parliament, and therefore became official on 29 January 1999. See Constitution (Parliamentary Secretaries) Act ©The State of QLD 1996.
On the same day the QLD Constitution 1867 reprint was proclaimed, thus verifiying the position of Parliamentary Secretary under its Constitution.
From this day on, the Governor of the State of QLD was no longer a sworn representative of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, but was now inside the 1867 Constitution, conducting the daily business of the government and allocating “laws” applicable to each government department. He was removed from his “no party allegiance” and had become, effectively, a part of the QLD government and under the Premier’s control.
On 9 November 2001, the Premier of the State of QLD, the Honorable Peter Beattie presented to Parliament the new Constitution of Queensland 2001 Bill.
The elected Members for the people of QLD, the Members of the Legislative Assembly, passed the Bill, said only to 'modernise' the Constitution of QLD.
This constitution was assented to by the Governor on 3rd December 2001 and upon assent, under section 95 of the new Constitution, Acts subject to the Constitution Act 1867 were repealed. Section 92 immediately came into force which repealed parts of the Constitution Act Amendment Act 1922. This allowed the Parliament to move back prior to the removal of the Legislative Council at referendum in 1922 and 'recreate' the positions of that former Legislative Council.
QLD then became, at the completion of these matters, without the assent of any of the laws by the Crown or Her Representative, an independent sovereign State and fractured the common law and the separation of powers in that state.
Although the Governor was clearly now a public servant under the current QLD State Government, he still held the Public Seal of the State, and sealed all documents signed under the Hand of the Sovereign with the Public Seal of the State, therefore rendering void, any contracts, Acts, Laws, etc under the Hand of the Sovereign.
In fact, on that day, 3 December 2001, the Governor of QLD with the authority of the Entrenched Provisions contained in the Constitution Act 1867 (Reprint No 1), and the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act which in their manner and form hold the entrenched provision of “The Governor of QLD”, and exercising the delegated authority of “The Crown”, did unilaterally ‘Assent’ to the ‘Constitution of Queensland Parliament of Queensland Bill’ without the consent of the People’s of QLD through the ultimate and absolute authority gained through a vote of ‘Referenda’.
And in doing so, this Constitution of Queensland 2001 became the ‘Fundamental Law of QLD.’
As the aim was to remove QLD from the Australian Federation, it was necessary to remove it back to the original QLD Constitution 1867, prior to Federation and make sure that Constitution was able to carry the intended results.
Consequently, this Constitution was reprinted but withheld for a date to be fixed, with 114 Changes, 131 Additions and 116 Deletions.
The most relevant change initially was the addition of over 14 sections regarding the expansion of the role of Parliamentary Secretary.
During the early 1990’s all major laws were reprinted, but held over for a fixed date.
On approx the 29 January 1998, the leader of the National Party placed on the table in Parliament, a document seeking to move the Governor of the State of QLD, into the Constitution Act 1867 as a parliamentary secretary and a public official. This was done under the Imperial Acts Application Act 1954 section 15DA.
This document was not challenged by any member of any party or any independent member of the QLD Parliament, and therefore became official on 29 January 1999. See Constitution (Parliamentary Secretaries) Act ©The State of QLD 1996.
On the same day the QLD Constitution 1867 reprint was proclaimed, thus verifiying the position of Parliamentary Secretary under its Constitution.
From this day on, the Governor of the State of QLD was no longer a sworn representative of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, but was now inside the 1867 Constitution, conducting the daily business of the government and allocating “laws” applicable to each government department. He was removed from his “no party allegiance” and had become, effectively, a part of the QLD government and under the Premier’s control.
On 9 November 2001, the Premier of the State of QLD, the Honorable Peter Beattie presented to Parliament the new Constitution of Queensland 2001 Bill.
The elected Members for the people of QLD, the Members of the Legislative Assembly, passed the Bill, said only to 'modernise' the Constitution of QLD.
This constitution was assented to by the Governor on 3rd December 2001 and upon assent, under section 95 of the new Constitution, Acts subject to the Constitution Act 1867 were repealed. Section 92 immediately came into force which repealed parts of the Constitution Act Amendment Act 1922. This allowed the Parliament to move back prior to the removal of the Legislative Council at referendum in 1922 and 'recreate' the positions of that former Legislative Council.
QLD then became, at the completion of these matters, without the assent of any of the laws by the Crown or Her Representative, an independent sovereign State and fractured the common law and the separation of powers in that state.
Although the Governor was clearly now a public servant under the current QLD State Government, he still held the Public Seal of the State, and sealed all documents signed under the Hand of the Sovereign with the Public Seal of the State, therefore rendering void, any contracts, Acts, Laws, etc under the Hand of the Sovereign.
In fact, on that day, 3 December 2001, the Governor of QLD with the authority of the Entrenched Provisions contained in the Constitution Act 1867 (Reprint No 1), and the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act which in their manner and form hold the entrenched provision of “The Governor of QLD”, and exercising the delegated authority of “The Crown”, did unilaterally ‘Assent’ to the ‘Constitution of Queensland Parliament of Queensland Bill’ without the consent of the People’s of QLD through the ultimate and absolute authority gained through a vote of ‘Referenda’.
And in doing so, this Constitution of Queensland 2001 became the ‘Fundamental Law of QLD.’
Monday, December 7, 2009
The Colour of Law in Australia
Every Common Law country has been battling the ever increasing surge of Government regulations, which have been removing our ownership rights, personal & civil liberties, rights of free speech and free will choice, that has been a key feature of our common law rights as men and women.
Why?
Money.
After the great wars, most countries were made bankrupt. Australia in 1932. Our country was already in massive debt to the international bankers, based in the City of London (a 1 mile square in the centre of London dominated by banking, insurance companies, trading companies and the like) – as they had funded much of the original early colonisation growth.
The deal was that Australia could continue to borrow – without having to ever repay the principal – as long as the government met the interest repayments.
To to do that they needed assets and the labour of the Australian people was the only asset that could produce money.
Yet, we were free will people with the right to choose whether we would pay off a debt that was not of our making.
So, we were manipulated subtly but surely to agree to contract ourselves to that debt.
How?
By our voluntary agreement to register ourselves as assets, firstly of the government of Australia, then more securely under the corporate government of Australia.
Registering what –
Our children at birth – for which we are paid a fee (family allowance) to recognize our role as guardians.
Starting a bank account
Driver’s licence
Tax file number
Electoral role
Marriage certificate
Trade licences
Torrens Title land registration
Etc, etc
Registration
At birth, each child is worth $1 million to the government – the birth certificate is printed on bond paper.
At all stages of registration, your value increases allowing more borrowings.
In many US state documents, the state is not only listed as a third party to every marriage but as the primary party.
This voluntary and ongoing registration enters each of us in a situation where we became contracted to the government and are “forced” to obey laws that would not apply under Common Law.
Therefore we become subject to speeding fines parking fines, rates, dog registration, child innoculations, etc and when we protest, we enter the courts as guilty people having to prove their innocence.
Where is our Common Law?
Oh, it is still there, but as we are no longer Common Law people, having voluntarily given ourselves to the corporation as a chattel, we cannot access it.
And because we still appear to have a Constitution, we can still get a jury trial for murder, we can still appear to have a Monarch guarding us, we THINK we still have access to our long history of rights, when in fact we do not.
We have what is called the Colour of Law. Looks right, but is overlaid with something completely different.
And because the only legitimate money in the world is gold and silver, which government took away from us during the wars, we can only buy and sell with pretend money / fiat money, which ultimately means we have not really paid for anything properly.
Are we the true parents of our children any more? No, we simply mind them for the government, which is why they can step in and take them off us.
Do we truly own our cars? No, the manufacturer’s deed of production is held by government, we simply get to “rent” them yearly.
Do we truly own our land? No, we hold the paper title, but the government holds the primary title through our registering our land under Torrens title.
And Mr Kerry Shine, Minister for Justice and Member for Toowoomba in QLD stated that in a reply to a letter from a constituent, published in the Toowoomba Chronicle August 11, when he said “Finally, in relation to Mr Patch's third enquiry (TC 25/07), Common Law land rights have not applied to Queensland freehold land since the introduction of the Torrens Land Title system in 1861 or the leasehold lands which are governed by the Lands Act 1994. The "Brigalow Corporation" simply administers land pursuant to this Act. This system functions effectively to protect the interest of private landholders in Queensland.”
This explains why we cannot get Common Law relief in a court of law, why we are constantly told the Bill of Rights does not apply, why we have our home taken from us, when this is against common law, why government authorities think they can trespass freely on our land and in our homes.
We have voluntarily registered our rights away.
Why?
Money.
After the great wars, most countries were made bankrupt. Australia in 1932. Our country was already in massive debt to the international bankers, based in the City of London (a 1 mile square in the centre of London dominated by banking, insurance companies, trading companies and the like) – as they had funded much of the original early colonisation growth.
The deal was that Australia could continue to borrow – without having to ever repay the principal – as long as the government met the interest repayments.
To to do that they needed assets and the labour of the Australian people was the only asset that could produce money.
Yet, we were free will people with the right to choose whether we would pay off a debt that was not of our making.
So, we were manipulated subtly but surely to agree to contract ourselves to that debt.
How?
By our voluntary agreement to register ourselves as assets, firstly of the government of Australia, then more securely under the corporate government of Australia.
Registering what –
Our children at birth – for which we are paid a fee (family allowance) to recognize our role as guardians.
Starting a bank account
Driver’s licence
Tax file number
Electoral role
Marriage certificate
Trade licences
Torrens Title land registration
Etc, etc
Registration
At birth, each child is worth $1 million to the government – the birth certificate is printed on bond paper.
At all stages of registration, your value increases allowing more borrowings.
In many US state documents, the state is not only listed as a third party to every marriage but as the primary party.
This voluntary and ongoing registration enters each of us in a situation where we became contracted to the government and are “forced” to obey laws that would not apply under Common Law.
Therefore we become subject to speeding fines parking fines, rates, dog registration, child innoculations, etc and when we protest, we enter the courts as guilty people having to prove their innocence.
Where is our Common Law?
Oh, it is still there, but as we are no longer Common Law people, having voluntarily given ourselves to the corporation as a chattel, we cannot access it.
And because we still appear to have a Constitution, we can still get a jury trial for murder, we can still appear to have a Monarch guarding us, we THINK we still have access to our long history of rights, when in fact we do not.
We have what is called the Colour of Law. Looks right, but is overlaid with something completely different.
And because the only legitimate money in the world is gold and silver, which government took away from us during the wars, we can only buy and sell with pretend money / fiat money, which ultimately means we have not really paid for anything properly.
Are we the true parents of our children any more? No, we simply mind them for the government, which is why they can step in and take them off us.
Do we truly own our cars? No, the manufacturer’s deed of production is held by government, we simply get to “rent” them yearly.
Do we truly own our land? No, we hold the paper title, but the government holds the primary title through our registering our land under Torrens title.
And Mr Kerry Shine, Minister for Justice and Member for Toowoomba in QLD stated that in a reply to a letter from a constituent, published in the Toowoomba Chronicle August 11, when he said “Finally, in relation to Mr Patch's third enquiry (TC 25/07), Common Law land rights have not applied to Queensland freehold land since the introduction of the Torrens Land Title system in 1861 or the leasehold lands which are governed by the Lands Act 1994. The "Brigalow Corporation" simply administers land pursuant to this Act. This system functions effectively to protect the interest of private landholders in Queensland.”
This explains why we cannot get Common Law relief in a court of law, why we are constantly told the Bill of Rights does not apply, why we have our home taken from us, when this is against common law, why government authorities think they can trespass freely on our land and in our homes.
We have voluntarily registered our rights away.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
