The Queensland Constitution 2001 / The Brigalow Corporation /
The Removal of all Ownership Rights in QLD & all other states of Australia.
GOVERNOR OF QUEENSLAND
1. Queensland Constitution 1867 was reframed with 114 Changes, 131 Additions and 116 Deletions.
2. January 1998, QLD National Party documented a move to place the QLD Governor in the Government as a Parliamentary Secretary under the QLD Constitution 1867 / Constitution (Parliamentary Secretaries) Act ©The State of QLD 1996.
3. This became official January 29 1999, the same day the QLD Constitution 1867 was reprinted.
4. Thus the Governor was no longer a sworn representative of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, but a Public Servant of the QLD Government.
5. He was still using the Public Seal of the State on behalf of the Premier and Parliament of QLD and maintained the appearance of the Governor to the Sovereign People of the State.
CROWN IN QUEENSLAND (& AUSTRALIA)
1. In 1973, Gough Whitlam brought in the Queen of Australia through the adoption of the Royal & Parliamentary Titles Act 1927
2. This removed Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heirs and Assigns as enshrined in the Commonwealth of Australian Constitution Act (UK) 1900 and replaced the Crown with the Queen of Australia.
3. On the 19 December 1973, the Whitlam Government also removed the Great Seal of Britain from use and replaced it with the Great Seal of Australia.
4. In 1986, Bob Hawke brought in the Australia Act.
5. This is the Constitution of the new Parliament of Australia.
6. This is not the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 of the People.
7. This act removed the ability of the UK Parliament to make laws for Australia, making Britain a foreign country. This was defined by the High Court in the case Sue v Hill 1999.
THE BRIGALOW CORPORATION & PRIVATE LAND OWNERSHIP
1. During the early 1990’s all important and relevant Acts were changed and framed, but were adjourned without a definite date of reprinting.
2. On 3 December 2001, the Queensland Constitution 2001 came into being.
3. On this day, this ACT became the “Fundamental Law of QLD”.
4. 7 June 2002, all the framed Acts were reprinted and became law.
5. QLD then became, at the completion of these matters, without the assent of any of the laws by the Crown or Her Representative, an independent sovereign State and fractured the common law and the separation of powers in that state.
6. 15 July 2002, The Corporations (Q) Act 1990 (Q) Reprint No 3 created in QLD a Corporate Government.
The State of Queensland Australia is registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commissions under No. 0001244818.
7. The Queensland Treasury Corp is registered under No. 0000852555.
8. The old crowns lands act (Qld) was converted to the Land Act 1994 (Qld), and at section 4(1) the Land Administration Commission was renamed Brigalow Corporation.
9. The Land Act 1994 – Reprint No 10c, Part 7A, Section 506C states that the Corporation (Brigalow Corp) represents the Crown.
10. Culminating in the Beattie Govt introduction of the QLD Constitution 2001, QLD government administrations had reworked backward every piece of Federal and state legislation, removing any connection to and mention of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, British law and the Royal Seal of England.
11. These acts were then reworked forward, replacing the removed elements with the Queen of Australia (as created by the Whitlam Govt in 1973) and the Great Seal of both Australia and QLD.
12. This means that the legislation contained in those acts are now “governed” by the government of those Seals, not the government of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900.
13. The Australia Waste Lands Act 1855 was reprinted in 1996 under the Seal of QLD, and because the Queen of Australia was also now sealed with the Seal of QLD, this effectively created a QLD “ownership” of all Crown land in Australia.
14. And as the introduction of the Corporations (Q) Act 1900 (Q) Reprint No 3 had created a Corporate Govt, this effectively meant all Crown land “ownership” was now under the control of the Qld Corporation, known as the Brigalow Corp.
15. All Crown land, assets and infrastructure in Australia including schools, hospitals, roads, etc are subject to and responsible to the Ministers of the State of QLD as cited at Chapter III of the QLD Constitution 2001.
16. All Sovereign People are now persons under the Corporation, All persons are chattel ( a piece of property that is moveable).
17. Their land, bank accounts and all items of ownership are now assets under the Brigalow Corporation.
18. The Supreme Court, the District Courts and the Magistrate’s Courts are now inside the Parliament of the State of QLD, and as such must obey the QLD Constitution 2001.
19. The Australian Constitution, the Common Law & Equity, the High Court and the Federal Government no longer have any superior governance over the State of QLD.
20. The State of QLD and the Sovereign People of QLD have only Civil and Statute Law in this state.
21. As private ownership can not exist under Civil and Statute Law, all private equity and inheritance in the State is now the property of “the State”.
LEGAL STRUCTURE
1. Under the civil law system, which is now subject to the Uniform Civil Procedures Rules of the Supreme Court Act 1991(Qld), every person is guilty until they prove their innocence.
2. The Common Law has been repealed from the Supreme Court Act 1995 (Q), Reprint No. 2, reprinted as in force 2 March 2001 © State of Q 2001
3. This states that the Governor in Council may make rules of court under this act for the Supreme Court, District court, Magistrates Court, registries and other matters mentioned in Schedule 1
4. Schedule 1 has jurisdiction over the civil, criminal and appellate courts, Parties & Proceedings, Defence, Service of Documents, Pleadings, Disclosure, Preservation of Rights & Property, Ending Proceedings Early, Court Supervision, Evidence, Jurisdiction of Judicial Registrars, Trails & Other Hearings, Particular Proceedings, probate, Contempt of Court, Vexatious Proceedings, Trusts, Costs, Appeals etc, Money Orders Enforcement, Foreign Judgment Enforcements, Corporations, Miscellaneous.
5. Therefore the Governor in Council now makes all the Rules of the Court for these matters.
6. The Queensland Constitution 2001 Chapters 1 & 2 refer to the Legislative Assembly and the Governor. In Chapter 3, Part 1, sect 27 – “The Governor in Council is the Governor acting with the advice of Executive Council.”
7. Sect 30 – “The Constitution Act 1867 contains provisions about the office of Governor. At Chapter 3, Part 4, sect 48, those “appointed as members…by the Governor…..”
8. This Executive council is given separate law makings Powers of the State at Chapter 3, Part 5, Sect 51, where is states, the Executive Government of the State of QLD (the “State) = The State may exercise its powers……
9. In Chapter 3, Part 5, Sect 55 (1) – “A minister may delegate a power of the State to an appropriately qualified officer of the State.” (“officer of the state” means – a chief executive………………….)
10. Therefore the Premier of QLD must always be the leader of the Executive Body and is now the Executive Leader of the Parliament of QLD.
11. Simply put – the Premier is delegated the power through his role as Chief Executive. This power controls the Executive Government of QLD. The Governor acts on the advice of the Executive Government.
12. Therefore the Premier is now the “Crown” in Queensland.
QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION
1. All government tiers, including Local Council are now inside the Parliament of the State of QLD.
2. The public officials are not public officials of “the Crown” but public officials of “the State” of QLD
THE PEOPLE OF THE COMMONWEALTH
1. The British colonies in Australia were all independent, under military law.
2. In 1885, the independent states had interstate agreements for trade, etc under the Federal Councils of Australasia Act 1855.
3. As free settlers began to grow, the People decided to unite under 1 form of government.
4. 10 years of conventions and referendums culminated in the Draft Constitution of the People which went to England for ratification.
5. On July 9 1900, Queen Victoria signed the amended draft Constitution and returned it to Australia.
6. At this point a final referendum was required to acquire the agreement of the people to this amended Constitution.
7. This was not done, the heads of each independent colony instead agreed FOR AND ON BEHALF of the People.
8. The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) was the result, brought into Australian law on 1 January 1901.
9. The first 8 clauses are British law.
10. The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution starts at clause 9.
11. The Constitution lays out the rules and regulations under which Parliament may administer government to the People.
12. There are no entities known as a Prime Minister or a Premier to be found in the Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 1900 (UK).
13. As the Preamble states, the People agreed to be united under one indissoluble Commonwealth.
14. Therefore the people are the Commonwealth.
15. The Commonwealth is defined in the Constitution as a State.
16. Therefore the People of the Commonwealth are their “own” state.
17. Section 117 states, verbatim, that the People governed by the Queen (of the Constitution), and members of a state (of the Commonwealth), cannot have their rights removed by another state (that perhaps being the state they physically live in), WITHOUT
18. Section 128 – A REFERENDUM
19. There has been no Referendum of the Sovereign People to approve any of these moves. This means they are Ultra vires, an act beyond the powers or authority of the government.
It appears that the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK) 1900, ratified on 1 January 1901 is an act of the heads of the independent colonies of the Australian dominion, which means that the Constitution of the People is still a draft document.
As the people had formally agreed to this document, all state and federal government in Australia are in fact, a foreign entity to the rights of the people of the Commonwealth.
As our land ownership is a Deed in Trust and Equity with the Queen of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution (UK) 1900, a foreign government has no lawful right to step inside that Deed and remove rights inherent in it.
In order to do so, government have created registration processes that manipulate our agreement. They have also created a new jurisdiction known as the Environment, with which they have enslaved the People as a plural, thereby creating legislation which enforces the People as an individual.
However, they have not asked our permission to create the form of government under which they now legislate OVER the People.
Showing posts with label QLD Constitution 2001. Show all posts
Showing posts with label QLD Constitution 2001. Show all posts
Sunday, January 10, 2010
Commonwealth Public Letters of Support to the High Court
February 4 2010 amendment - THANK YOU TO EVERYONE WHO HAS SUPPORTED THIS MATTER WITH LETTERS AND DONATIONS.
PLEASE DO NOT SEND ANY MORE LETTERS.
Although this matter is focused on QLD, this state is the key to the growing problems in all other states of Australia. All governments are following the "lead" of Queensland.
And the assets being sold in QLD are not assets of the QLDers, but of the People of the Commonwealth. Therefore we the People of the state of the Commonwealth ALSO had to give permission to both take and sell the assets.
So, we are also asking the people of the Commonwealth to sign the following letter and return it to us as soon as possible.
Fax to (07) 4096 2641
The cost of High Court cases are massive, please donate $165 (incl GST) per family OR $110 (incl GST) per individual.
Either as a postal order, a cheque or into the following account Envirowild Pty Ltd
NAB
BSB: 084 512
Account No: 79847 1759
Name ………………...…………………………………………………….
Residential Address ……..………………………………………………………………..
………………………………………………………………………
Postal Address ………………………...…………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………
I am a person as described in the Preamble and at Section 117, subject to Section 128
of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 proclaimed 1st January 1901,
which was the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK).
I, along with all the other sovereign people inside the Constitution as in its Preamble, am an equal shareholder of all the assets of the Commonwealth of Australia, those assets being currently held under the Corporations Act 2001 (C’wth).
I, as a citizen of the Commonwealth of Australia, have never been presented with any referendum subject to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, to allow Queensland to become a Sovereign State.
I, as a citizen of the Commonwealth of Australia, have never been presented with any referendum subject to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, to allow my assets to pass from those held by the Commonwealth, to any corporation in Queensland.
I hereby support the Demand for Information from The Honourable Anna Bligh MP Premier of the State of Queensland as requested by Mr David John Walter on 1st December 2009.
If this matter is to be put before the High Court, I request that the High Court accept this as my application to join in the application for a writ to be put to The Honourable Anna Bligh MP Premier of the State of Queensland, as no referendum has been placed before me in these matters by my elected Members of the body politic thereby failing to respect and uphold the trust I placed in them by my vote.
I also request that the High Court allow further time for acceptance of any other sovereign person of the Commonwealth of Australia to join in this action after its initial lodgement.
……………………………………… ………………………………………
(Printed Full Name) (Signature)
Signed this ………………..……..….…….. day of ………….…..……….….…….. 20…..
PLEASE DO NOT SEND ANY MORE LETTERS.
Although this matter is focused on QLD, this state is the key to the growing problems in all other states of Australia. All governments are following the "lead" of Queensland.
And the assets being sold in QLD are not assets of the QLDers, but of the People of the Commonwealth. Therefore we the People of the state of the Commonwealth ALSO had to give permission to both take and sell the assets.
So, we are also asking the people of the Commonwealth to sign the following letter and return it to us as soon as possible.
Fax to (07) 4096 2641
The cost of High Court cases are massive, please donate $165 (incl GST) per family OR $110 (incl GST) per individual.
Either as a postal order, a cheque or into the following account Envirowild Pty Ltd
NAB
BSB: 084 512
Account No: 79847 1759
Name ………………...…………………………………………………….
Residential Address ……..………………………………………………………………..
………………………………………………………………………
Postal Address ………………………...…………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………
I am a person as described in the Preamble and at Section 117, subject to Section 128
of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 proclaimed 1st January 1901,
which was the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK).
I, along with all the other sovereign people inside the Constitution as in its Preamble, am an equal shareholder of all the assets of the Commonwealth of Australia, those assets being currently held under the Corporations Act 2001 (C’wth).
I, as a citizen of the Commonwealth of Australia, have never been presented with any referendum subject to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, to allow Queensland to become a Sovereign State.
I, as a citizen of the Commonwealth of Australia, have never been presented with any referendum subject to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, to allow my assets to pass from those held by the Commonwealth, to any corporation in Queensland.
I hereby support the Demand for Information from The Honourable Anna Bligh MP Premier of the State of Queensland as requested by Mr David John Walter on 1st December 2009.
If this matter is to be put before the High Court, I request that the High Court accept this as my application to join in the application for a writ to be put to The Honourable Anna Bligh MP Premier of the State of Queensland, as no referendum has been placed before me in these matters by my elected Members of the body politic thereby failing to respect and uphold the trust I placed in them by my vote.
I also request that the High Court allow further time for acceptance of any other sovereign person of the Commonwealth of Australia to join in this action after its initial lodgement.
……………………………………… ………………………………………
(Printed Full Name) (Signature)
Signed this ………………..……..….…….. day of ………….…..……….….…….. 20…..
QLD Public Letters of Support to the High Court
February 4 2010 - THANK YOU TO EVERYONE WHO SUPPORTED THIS MATTER WITH LETTERS AND DONATIONS.
PLEASE DO NOT SEND ANY MORE LETTERS.
The EnviroWild Team is asking for support with our lodgement in the High Court in January, asking the Justices to ask the Premier of QLD to answer the Demand Questions.
Following is the letter we are asking the People of QLD to sign and return to us.
Fax to (07) 4096 2641
The cost of High Court cases are massive, please donate $165 (incl GST) per family OR $110 (incl GST) per individual.
Either as a postal order, a cheque or into the following account Envirowild Pty Ltd
NAB
BSB: 084 512 Account No: 79847 1759
Name ………………...…………………………………………………….
Residential Address ……..………………………………………………………………..
………………………………………………………………………
Postal Address ………………………...…………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………
I am a sovereign person and an entity inside the
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) of 9th July 1900 and the
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 proclaimed on the 1st January 1901.
I, along with all the other sovereign people inside the Constitution as in its Preamble, am an equal shareholder of all the assets of the Commonwealth of Australia, those assets being currently held under the Corporations Act 2001 (C’wth).
I hereby support the Demand for Information from The Honourable Anna Bligh MP Premier of the State of Queensland by Mr David John Walter on 1st December 2009.
If this information has not been supplied to Mr David John Walter by close of business on 31st December 2009, I wish to be named in the application for a prerogative writ of mandamus, that The Honourable Anna Bligh MP Premier of the State of Queensland, presents the information requested by Mr David John Walter on 1st December 2009, at a date of mention to the full High Court, subject to Chapter III of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act at Sections 75(5), 76(2) and 80.
On the day of mention to the full High Court, if the information is still not forthcoming, a further request will be made by Mr David John Walter for a further writ.
I have not been informed by any elected representative of the body politic of either Queensland or the Commonwealth of Australia, as to changes to Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867, subject to Section 53, to alter the position of that Constitution.
I have not been requested by the subjects of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act under Sections 117 to 128, to vote as to whether to allow Queensland, as a State of the Commonwealth of Australia subject to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) and the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901, to become a Sovereign State, to vote as to whether Queensland may use the assets of the sovereign people under the Corporations Act 2001 (C’wth), and to vote as to whether Queensland’s legislature should not comply with section 109 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) and the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901.
If this matter is to be put before the High Court, I also request that the High Court accept this as my application to join in the application for a prerogative writ of mandamus to be put to The Honourable Anna Bligh MP Premier of the State of Queensland, as no referendum has been placed before me in these matters by my elected Members of the body politic thereby failing to respect and uphold the trust I placed in them by my vote.
I also request that the High Court allow further time for acceptance of any other sovereign person of the Commonwealth of Australia to join in this action after its initial lodgement.
……………………………………… ………………………………………
(Printed Full Name) (Signature)
Signed this ………………..……..….…….. day of ………….…..……….….…….. 20…..
PLEASE DO NOT SEND ANY MORE LETTERS.
The EnviroWild Team is asking for support with our lodgement in the High Court in January, asking the Justices to ask the Premier of QLD to answer the Demand Questions.
Following is the letter we are asking the People of QLD to sign and return to us.
Fax to (07) 4096 2641
The cost of High Court cases are massive, please donate $165 (incl GST) per family OR $110 (incl GST) per individual.
Either as a postal order, a cheque or into the following account Envirowild Pty Ltd
NAB
BSB: 084 512 Account No: 79847 1759
Name ………………...…………………………………………………….
Residential Address ……..………………………………………………………………..
………………………………………………………………………
Postal Address ………………………...…………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………
I am a sovereign person and an entity inside the
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) of 9th July 1900 and the
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 proclaimed on the 1st January 1901.
I, along with all the other sovereign people inside the Constitution as in its Preamble, am an equal shareholder of all the assets of the Commonwealth of Australia, those assets being currently held under the Corporations Act 2001 (C’wth).
I hereby support the Demand for Information from The Honourable Anna Bligh MP Premier of the State of Queensland by Mr David John Walter on 1st December 2009.
If this information has not been supplied to Mr David John Walter by close of business on 31st December 2009, I wish to be named in the application for a prerogative writ of mandamus, that The Honourable Anna Bligh MP Premier of the State of Queensland, presents the information requested by Mr David John Walter on 1st December 2009, at a date of mention to the full High Court, subject to Chapter III of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act at Sections 75(5), 76(2) and 80.
On the day of mention to the full High Court, if the information is still not forthcoming, a further request will be made by Mr David John Walter for a further writ.
I have not been informed by any elected representative of the body politic of either Queensland or the Commonwealth of Australia, as to changes to Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867, subject to Section 53, to alter the position of that Constitution.
I have not been requested by the subjects of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act under Sections 117 to 128, to vote as to whether to allow Queensland, as a State of the Commonwealth of Australia subject to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) and the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901, to become a Sovereign State, to vote as to whether Queensland may use the assets of the sovereign people under the Corporations Act 2001 (C’wth), and to vote as to whether Queensland’s legislature should not comply with section 109 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) and the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901.
If this matter is to be put before the High Court, I also request that the High Court accept this as my application to join in the application for a prerogative writ of mandamus to be put to The Honourable Anna Bligh MP Premier of the State of Queensland, as no referendum has been placed before me in these matters by my elected Members of the body politic thereby failing to respect and uphold the trust I placed in them by my vote.
I also request that the High Court allow further time for acceptance of any other sovereign person of the Commonwealth of Australia to join in this action after its initial lodgement.
……………………………………… ………………………………………
(Printed Full Name) (Signature)
Signed this ………………..……..….…….. day of ………….…..……….….…….. 20…..
Thursday, January 7, 2010
Reply from Anna Bligh, Premier of QLD
The office of Anna Bligh replied to the Demand letter one day before the 21 days were up.
We were not provided with any referendum details whatsoever and the letter replied from the perspective of the Qld Constitution 2001 and not the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900.
You will also note that the letter states that the Governor's role is mandated by the QLD Constitution 2001, when rightfully, the governor is an entity of the 1900 Constitution under the Royal Seal. The QLD Constitution 2001, is of course sealed under the Seal of QLD (as was this letter), indicating that the Governor now answers to the acts emanating from the government of that Seal.
This now moves to the High Court, who, next week, will be asked to ask the Qld Premier the same questions.
The reply from the office of Anna Bligh, Premier of QLD.....................
Transcript of the reply............
Office of the Premier
Executive Building
100 George St Brisbane
PO Box 15185 City East
Queensland 4002 Australia
Telephone +61 7 3334 4500
Facsimile +61 7 3221 3631
Email ThePremier@premiers.qld.gov.au
Website http://www.thepremier.qld.gov.au/
For reply please quote CALS/DS - TF/09/34138 - DOC/09/143649
17 DEC 2009
Mr David Walter
Envirowild Pty Ltd
PO Box 578
HERBERTON QLD 4887
Dear Mr Walter,
Thank you for your letter of 1 December 2009 concerning consitutional matters. I have been asked to reply to you on the Premier's behalf.
You have alleged that the Queensland Government has moved to remove the Crown from Queensland legislation and alter the Office of the Governor. I can assure you that the Queensland government has taken no such action.
The role of the Governor in Queensland is clearly mandated by Part 2 of the Constitution of Queensland 2001. The Governor is Her Majesty's representative in Queensland and holds office during Her Majesty's pleasure. The Governor gives Royal Assent to Bills passed by the Parliament, may summon and dissolve Parliament, appoints all ministers and may issue writs and grant pardons.
While Section 128 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia provides that a referendum is required to alter any part of the Commonwealth Constitution, Queensland's Constitution is different.
As Queensland's constitutional laws are ordinary Acts of our Parliament, they can be changed by passing other ordinary Acts of Parliament. The Constitution of Queensland Act 2001 is an Act of the Queensland Parliament which primarily brings together the constitutional provisions of other Acts of the Queensland Parliament into one Act which can be referred to as our Constitution.
Any provisions of Queensland's Constitution Acts which were entrenched (that is required a referendum to change) have not been changed, and remain in force.
The provisions which remain in their original Acts include:
We were not provided with any referendum details whatsoever and the letter replied from the perspective of the Qld Constitution 2001 and not the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900.
You will also note that the letter states that the Governor's role is mandated by the QLD Constitution 2001, when rightfully, the governor is an entity of the 1900 Constitution under the Royal Seal. The QLD Constitution 2001, is of course sealed under the Seal of QLD (as was this letter), indicating that the Governor now answers to the acts emanating from the government of that Seal.
This now moves to the High Court, who, next week, will be asked to ask the Qld Premier the same questions.
The reply from the office of Anna Bligh, Premier of QLD.....................
Transcript of the reply............
Office of the Premier
Executive Building
100 George St Brisbane
PO Box 15185 City East
Queensland 4002 Australia
Telephone +61 7 3334 4500
Facsimile +61 7 3221 3631
Email ThePremier@premiers.qld.gov.au
Website http://www.thepremier.qld.gov.au/
For reply please quote CALS/DS - TF/09/34138 - DOC/09/143649
17 DEC 2009
Mr David Walter
Envirowild Pty Ltd
PO Box 578
HERBERTON QLD 4887
Dear Mr Walter,
Thank you for your letter of 1 December 2009 concerning consitutional matters. I have been asked to reply to you on the Premier's behalf.
You have alleged that the Queensland Government has moved to remove the Crown from Queensland legislation and alter the Office of the Governor. I can assure you that the Queensland government has taken no such action.
The role of the Governor in Queensland is clearly mandated by Part 2 of the Constitution of Queensland 2001. The Governor is Her Majesty's representative in Queensland and holds office during Her Majesty's pleasure. The Governor gives Royal Assent to Bills passed by the Parliament, may summon and dissolve Parliament, appoints all ministers and may issue writs and grant pardons.
While Section 128 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia provides that a referendum is required to alter any part of the Commonwealth Constitution, Queensland's Constitution is different.
As Queensland's constitutional laws are ordinary Acts of our Parliament, they can be changed by passing other ordinary Acts of Parliament. The Constitution of Queensland Act 2001 is an Act of the Queensland Parliament which primarily brings together the constitutional provisions of other Acts of the Queensland Parliament into one Act which can be referred to as our Constitution.
Any provisions of Queensland's Constitution Acts which were entrenched (that is required a referendum to change) have not been changed, and remain in force.
The provisions which remain in their original Acts include:
- the establishment and legislative power of the Parliament of Queensland
- the duration of the Parliament, and
- matters relating to the office of the Governor.
Please be assured that the Queensland Government is committed to the ongoing governance of Queensland.
I trust this information has been of assistance to you.
Yours sincerely,
Jessica Collins
Policy Adviser
Demand Request for Anna Bligh, Premier of QLD
What is happening in QLD is the primer for the removal of all property rights in the other states of Australia.
By effectively removing themselves from the 1900 Constitution in 1923, yet maintaining the appearance of being part of the Commonwealth in order to continue to accept money from consolidated revenue, the QLD govt have become a "foreign government" in Australia.
As Mr Rudd and the Governor-General Quentin Bryce both come from this independent state, Australia is now a "colony" of QLD, the government of which has claimed the land of the Crown of the 1900 Constitution and placed it under the Crown know as the Executive Government of QLD.
On December 2 2009, David John Walter sent Anna Bligh the following letter...............................
The Honourable Anna Bligh MP
Premier of the State of Queensland
Parliament House
Brisbane Qld 4000
RE: DEMAND FOR INFORMATION FROM THE HONOURABLE ANNA BLIGH MP PREMIER OF THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND
1. I, David John Walter,
am a sovereign person under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)
(reference Chapter 12 of 63 and 64 Victoria of 9th July 1900 AD) and under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 proclaimed on 1st January 1901,
am an equal shareholder, along with all the other sovereign persons under the above-mentioned Constitution of all the assets of the Commonwealth of Australia inter alia with the Corporations Act 2001 (C’wth),
am a citizen of the indissoluble Federal Commonwealth, the Commonwealth of Australia, under the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland,
am a loyal subject of Her Majesty The Queen, Elizabeth II, Her Heirs and Successors,
and am a resident in the Commonwealth of Australia’s State of Queensland
at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
2. I hereby place before you a Demand for Information with regard to the following:-
Demand for Information
from
The Honourable Anna Bligh MP Premier of the State of Queensland
requested by
David J. Walter
2.1. Full results of the referendum to progressively remove the constitutional Crown from legislation in Queensland.
(Refer: Section 53 Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867)
2.2. Full results of the referendum to progressively alter the position of the office of the Crown’s representative in Queensland, the Governor of Queensland.
(Refer: Section 53 Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867)
2.3. Full results of the referendum to progressively pass to the corporate Queensland Government, the assets of the sovereign people of Commonwealth of Australia.
(Refer: Sections 117-128 of the
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901)
2.4. Full list and details of transfer of those assets.
2.5. Full results of the referendum to progressively remove entrenched sections of Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867.
(Refer: Section 53 Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867)
2.6. Full results of the referendum to remove Queensland from the Commonwealth.
(Refer: Section 53 Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867 and Sections 117-128 of the
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901)
3. The citizens of the Commonwealth of Australia have the right to a referendum under Section 128 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901, before any attempt to alter this Constitution may be made.
4. The citizens of the Commonwealth of Australia who are also residents in the Commonwealth of Australia’s State of Queensland have the right to a referendum under Section 53 ofQueensland’s Constitution Act 1867, extract from which states:- “A Bill that expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of or alteration in the office of Governor or that expressly or impliedly in any way affects any of the following sections of this Act namely—sections 1, 2, 2A, 11A, 11B, 14; and this section 53 shall not be presented for assent by or in the name of the Queen unless it has first been approved by the electors in accordance with this section and a Bill so assented to consequent upon its presentation in contravention of this subsection shall be of no effect as an Act.”
5. The Parliament of Queensland Act 2001 and its Constitution of Queensland 2001 have removed entrenched sections of Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867 by removing the Separation of Powers, by placing members of the executive government, the premier and cabinet ministers, inside the current Parliament in Queensland, by altering the positions of judges of the Supreme and District Courts, the positions of Ministers of the Crown, and the position of Governor, the Crown’s representative, to positions of office holders inside that Parliament, and by changing Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) to Members of Parliament (MP), all contra to Section 53 of Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867 and Sections 117-128 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901.
6. Also contra to Section 53 of Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867 and Sections 117-128 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901, with this demise of the Crown, Her Majesty’s Police Force as people once knew it and which protected the Crown and its people, has been changed to the Queensland Police Service which now protects only the Queensland Government owned corporations and has therefore become a security agency for these corporations but has no lawful Crown authority over us, the sovereign people.
7. Also contra to Section 53 of Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867 and Sections 117-128 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901, with this demise of the Crown, the ownership of property which includes freehold land as people once knew it has been changed, with the corporate Queensland Government taking an unregistered interest in property and land, by placing its corporate seal on people’s property and certificates of title, thereby taking joint ownership of that property and land, but without the owners’ consent.
8. Also contra to Section 53 of Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867 and Sections 117-128 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901, with this demise of the Crown, The Treasury, under its corporate seal, borrows money on the people’s and Crown’s assets and deals at will with that money with no accountability to the people.
9. I require this information to be forwarded to me within 21 working days from the date below.
…………………………………………..
(David J. Walter)1st December 2009
By effectively removing themselves from the 1900 Constitution in 1923, yet maintaining the appearance of being part of the Commonwealth in order to continue to accept money from consolidated revenue, the QLD govt have become a "foreign government" in Australia.
As Mr Rudd and the Governor-General Quentin Bryce both come from this independent state, Australia is now a "colony" of QLD, the government of which has claimed the land of the Crown of the 1900 Constitution and placed it under the Crown know as the Executive Government of QLD.
On December 2 2009, David John Walter sent Anna Bligh the following letter...............................
The Honourable Anna Bligh MP
Premier of the State of Queensland
Parliament House
Brisbane Qld 4000
RE: DEMAND FOR INFORMATION FROM THE HONOURABLE ANNA BLIGH MP PREMIER OF THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND
1. I, David John Walter,
am a sovereign person under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)
(reference Chapter 12 of 63 and 64 Victoria of 9th July 1900 AD) and under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 proclaimed on 1st January 1901,
am an equal shareholder, along with all the other sovereign persons under the above-mentioned Constitution of all the assets of the Commonwealth of Australia inter alia with the Corporations Act 2001 (C’wth),
am a citizen of the indissoluble Federal Commonwealth, the Commonwealth of Australia, under the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland,
am a loyal subject of Her Majesty The Queen, Elizabeth II, Her Heirs and Successors,
and am a resident in the Commonwealth of Australia’s State of Queensland
at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
2. I hereby place before you a Demand for Information with regard to the following:-
Demand for Information
from
The Honourable Anna Bligh MP Premier of the State of Queensland
requested by
David J. Walter
2.1. Full results of the referendum to progressively remove the constitutional Crown from legislation in Queensland.
(Refer: Section 53 Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867)
2.2. Full results of the referendum to progressively alter the position of the office of the Crown’s representative in Queensland, the Governor of Queensland.
(Refer: Section 53 Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867)
2.3. Full results of the referendum to progressively pass to the corporate Queensland Government, the assets of the sovereign people of Commonwealth of Australia.
(Refer: Sections 117-128 of the
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901)
2.4. Full list and details of transfer of those assets.
2.5. Full results of the referendum to progressively remove entrenched sections of Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867.
(Refer: Section 53 Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867)
2.6. Full results of the referendum to remove Queensland from the Commonwealth.
(Refer: Section 53 Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867 and Sections 117-128 of the
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901)
3. The citizens of the Commonwealth of Australia have the right to a referendum under Section 128 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901, before any attempt to alter this Constitution may be made.
4. The citizens of the Commonwealth of Australia who are also residents in the Commonwealth of Australia’s State of Queensland have the right to a referendum under Section 53 ofQueensland’s Constitution Act 1867, extract from which states:- “A Bill that expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of or alteration in the office of Governor or that expressly or impliedly in any way affects any of the following sections of this Act namely—sections 1, 2, 2A, 11A, 11B, 14; and this section 53 shall not be presented for assent by or in the name of the Queen unless it has first been approved by the electors in accordance with this section and a Bill so assented to consequent upon its presentation in contravention of this subsection shall be of no effect as an Act.”
5. The Parliament of Queensland Act 2001 and its Constitution of Queensland 2001 have removed entrenched sections of Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867 by removing the Separation of Powers, by placing members of the executive government, the premier and cabinet ministers, inside the current Parliament in Queensland, by altering the positions of judges of the Supreme and District Courts, the positions of Ministers of the Crown, and the position of Governor, the Crown’s representative, to positions of office holders inside that Parliament, and by changing Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) to Members of Parliament (MP), all contra to Section 53 of Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867 and Sections 117-128 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901.
6. Also contra to Section 53 of Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867 and Sections 117-128 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901, with this demise of the Crown, Her Majesty’s Police Force as people once knew it and which protected the Crown and its people, has been changed to the Queensland Police Service which now protects only the Queensland Government owned corporations and has therefore become a security agency for these corporations but has no lawful Crown authority over us, the sovereign people.
7. Also contra to Section 53 of Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867 and Sections 117-128 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901, with this demise of the Crown, the ownership of property which includes freehold land as people once knew it has been changed, with the corporate Queensland Government taking an unregistered interest in property and land, by placing its corporate seal on people’s property and certificates of title, thereby taking joint ownership of that property and land, but without the owners’ consent.
8. Also contra to Section 53 of Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867 and Sections 117-128 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901, with this demise of the Crown, The Treasury, under its corporate seal, borrows money on the people’s and Crown’s assets and deals at will with that money with no accountability to the people.
9. I require this information to be forwarded to me within 21 working days from the date below.
…………………………………………..
(David J. Walter)1st December 2009
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
Courts of Australia in 2009
How or why does this jurisdiction refuse to recognize common law & equity, or any authorities in jurisprudence?
Let’s look at Queensland. Under the current Parliamentary Supremacy of govt, this state was ‘birthed’ in 2001, when the Qld Constitution 2001 came into existence. And hence the new jurisprudence of public policy.
Due to that timeline the supreme “Authority” for jurisprudence is held by “Bone v Mothershaw” which was a decision off the back of the newly commenced Constitution. All jurisprudence in Queensland has a “Start Date” of (approx) June 2002 to this present day.
And remember, the outcome of Bone v Mothershaw was that a court could refuse to give a petitioner permission to take their appeal to the High Court, because the High Court would refuse it!
So, the first authority for jurisprudent decisions removed the High Court from this new structure of law.
No court in QLD can use any case prior to this date as a decision making tool. And because there is such a shortage of cases to use, the Courts are bound to the Statutory Instruments (legislation).
Because of this lack of any pre-existing jurisprudence in authorities, the Courts must use that very same Statutory Instrument not only for the Court’s jurisprudence but for its authority.
In other words, the current govt legislation gives the court its rules and tells the court its decisions. And so the courts must find for the govt in almost all relevant cases.
Under that structure of legislative “precedent”, the courts now operate under a balance of probabilities. For example – you may have a tree on your land, a particular bird may prefer to nest in that type of tree, however at a point in time, the bird has never done so. You cut down that tree, and are fined heavily under the relevant environmental laws.
In effect, the court must rule that the bird could have nested in that tree, may be planning to nest in that tree, may even have been in the process of nesting in that tree, and if it had you would have harmed the bird when felling the tree.
Therefore on the balance of probabilities, you are guilty. And you cannot prove yourself innocent because there is no legislation that gives you any way of doing so.
Now at this point, you are all probably jumping up and down and telling me “They can’t do that!” “We haven’t had a referendum about this!” “They can’t do that under this law, that law, the other law!” And a few more “They can’t do that!”
Well, they have. And the sooner we accept that and work out how to restore our Constitution to its supremacy, return ourselves to being common law men and women, turf out these fraudulent individuals and learn to protect our vital rights, the less likely this is to happen ever again.
Meanwhile, it has and what can we do about it?
Let’s look at Queensland. Under the current Parliamentary Supremacy of govt, this state was ‘birthed’ in 2001, when the Qld Constitution 2001 came into existence. And hence the new jurisprudence of public policy.
Due to that timeline the supreme “Authority” for jurisprudence is held by “Bone v Mothershaw” which was a decision off the back of the newly commenced Constitution. All jurisprudence in Queensland has a “Start Date” of (approx) June 2002 to this present day.
And remember, the outcome of Bone v Mothershaw was that a court could refuse to give a petitioner permission to take their appeal to the High Court, because the High Court would refuse it!
So, the first authority for jurisprudent decisions removed the High Court from this new structure of law.
No court in QLD can use any case prior to this date as a decision making tool. And because there is such a shortage of cases to use, the Courts are bound to the Statutory Instruments (legislation).
Because of this lack of any pre-existing jurisprudence in authorities, the Courts must use that very same Statutory Instrument not only for the Court’s jurisprudence but for its authority.
In other words, the current govt legislation gives the court its rules and tells the court its decisions. And so the courts must find for the govt in almost all relevant cases.
Under that structure of legislative “precedent”, the courts now operate under a balance of probabilities. For example – you may have a tree on your land, a particular bird may prefer to nest in that type of tree, however at a point in time, the bird has never done so. You cut down that tree, and are fined heavily under the relevant environmental laws.
In effect, the court must rule that the bird could have nested in that tree, may be planning to nest in that tree, may even have been in the process of nesting in that tree, and if it had you would have harmed the bird when felling the tree.
Therefore on the balance of probabilities, you are guilty. And you cannot prove yourself innocent because there is no legislation that gives you any way of doing so.
Now at this point, you are all probably jumping up and down and telling me “They can’t do that!” “We haven’t had a referendum about this!” “They can’t do that under this law, that law, the other law!” And a few more “They can’t do that!”
Well, they have. And the sooner we accept that and work out how to restore our Constitution to its supremacy, return ourselves to being common law men and women, turf out these fraudulent individuals and learn to protect our vital rights, the less likely this is to happen ever again.
Meanwhile, it has and what can we do about it?
Monday, December 14, 2009
Brigalow Corporation
Brigalow Corporation (of the State of Qld) originated in the old Qld crowns lands act and came about through the Qld government borrowing from the federal government funds to develop what was termed the “Brigalow Belt” (about 4 mil acres) out from Rockhampton during the 1960’s.
The old crowns lands act (Qld) has now been converted to the “Land Act 1994 (Qld)” and this is where you can find the “Brigalow Corporation” today. In essence the government of Qld has moved all the crowns land AND all crown land that was sold (fee simple) into the Brigalow Corporation through the Land Act, Land Title Act, Property Law Act, etc, etc, etc.
This was achieved through a series of Constitutional changes that were “Reprinted” into and out of the 1867 Constitution commencing in 1996 with “Reprint no 1” and ending with the introduction of the 2001 Queensland Constitution Act (whole new constitution) all without a referendum of any sort.
Once the necessary changes to the “Engine” have been made then moving or amending all subordinate laws is very simple, just reprint them starting with the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 (Qld).
The “Brigalow Corporation” in not Listed as a “Public” company on the Stock Exchange, it is an “Exempt Public Authority” which is found by definition at s9 and 5A of the Corporations Act 2001 (C’wth) (in right of the crown), except there is no “Crown” in Qld just “the State”.
The term “The State” or as written in most the modern Qld statutes, “This Act binds the state” is reminiscent of Stalin’s Russia where everything was the property of “The State”.
The old crowns lands act (Qld) has now been converted to the “Land Act 1994 (Qld)” and this is where you can find the “Brigalow Corporation” today. In essence the government of Qld has moved all the crowns land AND all crown land that was sold (fee simple) into the Brigalow Corporation through the Land Act, Land Title Act, Property Law Act, etc, etc, etc.
This was achieved through a series of Constitutional changes that were “Reprinted” into and out of the 1867 Constitution commencing in 1996 with “Reprint no 1” and ending with the introduction of the 2001 Queensland Constitution Act (whole new constitution) all without a referendum of any sort.
Once the necessary changes to the “Engine” have been made then moving or amending all subordinate laws is very simple, just reprint them starting with the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 (Qld).
The “Brigalow Corporation” in not Listed as a “Public” company on the Stock Exchange, it is an “Exempt Public Authority” which is found by definition at s9 and 5A of the Corporations Act 2001 (C’wth) (in right of the crown), except there is no “Crown” in Qld just “the State”.
The term “The State” or as written in most the modern Qld statutes, “This Act binds the state” is reminiscent of Stalin’s Russia where everything was the property of “The State”.
Queensland Has 3 Constitutions
The 1867 Constitution is still there, as facilitated by Chapters 1 & 2, specifically section 9 of the Constitution of Queensland 2001.
HOWEVER , a very careful reader will find that there is a Second Constitution Embedded within the 2001 Constitution and it Starts at Chapter 3 specifically sections 51 together with 27.
This is the law making power of “the State” which ONLY includes those individuals to the power of those individuals, so given as mentioned at section 51.
Sections 51 & 27 offer a whole new law making power (the power of “the State”) this is a Separate Power from that of section 9 of Chapter 1 which is the law making power of the Legislative Assembly.
HOWEVER through the use of the Seal of “the State” over laws passing through the Legislative Assembly, IF NOT by the use of section 15DA of the Act Interpretation 1954, therefore ALL laws come under the power & authority of Chapters 3 – 10 of the Constitution of Queensland 2001.
Laws that come under the powers of “the State” at section 51 are easy to recognise they are bound by “This Act binds all persons including the State” .
Laws that have not been sealed with the seal of “the State” bind back to the 1867 Constitution and are easy to recognise as they are bound by “This Act binds the Crown in all its capacities” .
There are precious few of these Acts left in Queensland.
Simply put,
the legislature passes a bill under section 9 of the 2001 Constitution ( which represents the old 1867 Constitution),
then the Governor seals it with the seal of “the State” and, in so doing the newly made law passes to Chapter 3 (section 51) of the 2001 Constitution, abrogating the law from the 1867 Constitution therefore the Common law.
It really is so simple in setting up a claytons democracy. The legislative Assembly (s9) honestly think that they made a law to their power and, they have control over that law, however in reality “the State” has kidnapped the law on assent through the seal.
“the State” (s51) = The premier (dictator) + the lackey Ministers (dictatorial assistants).
“the State” can also, and often does, use another method in making laws to the power of section 51 of the Constitution 2001 and that is by using section 15DA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 by simple laying an “Undebated or Voted on” “Bill” on the Table of the so called parliament for a period, and once that period has expired the “Bill” simply “Automatically” becomes Law to the power of Chapter 3 of the Constitution of Queensland 2001.
Technically, and perhaps a bit simplistic, Queensland at present has 3 Constitutions
(1) the 1867 Constitution (derogated)
(2) the Constitution of Queensland 2001 Chapters 1 and 2 (useless)
(3) the Constitution of Queensland 2001 Chapters 3 – 10 (power & glory).
Prepared June 2008
HOWEVER , a very careful reader will find that there is a Second Constitution Embedded within the 2001 Constitution and it Starts at Chapter 3 specifically sections 51 together with 27.
This is the law making power of “the State” which ONLY includes those individuals to the power of those individuals, so given as mentioned at section 51.
Sections 51 & 27 offer a whole new law making power (the power of “the State”) this is a Separate Power from that of section 9 of Chapter 1 which is the law making power of the Legislative Assembly.
HOWEVER through the use of the Seal of “the State” over laws passing through the Legislative Assembly, IF NOT by the use of section 15DA of the Act Interpretation 1954, therefore ALL laws come under the power & authority of Chapters 3 – 10 of the Constitution of Queensland 2001.
Laws that come under the powers of “the State” at section 51 are easy to recognise they are bound by “This Act binds all persons including the State” .
Laws that have not been sealed with the seal of “the State” bind back to the 1867 Constitution and are easy to recognise as they are bound by “This Act binds the Crown in all its capacities” .
There are precious few of these Acts left in Queensland.
Simply put,
the legislature passes a bill under section 9 of the 2001 Constitution ( which represents the old 1867 Constitution),
then the Governor seals it with the seal of “the State” and, in so doing the newly made law passes to Chapter 3 (section 51) of the 2001 Constitution, abrogating the law from the 1867 Constitution therefore the Common law.
It really is so simple in setting up a claytons democracy. The legislative Assembly (s9) honestly think that they made a law to their power and, they have control over that law, however in reality “the State” has kidnapped the law on assent through the seal.
“the State” (s51) = The premier (dictator) + the lackey Ministers (dictatorial assistants).
“the State” can also, and often does, use another method in making laws to the power of section 51 of the Constitution 2001 and that is by using section 15DA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 by simple laying an “Undebated or Voted on” “Bill” on the Table of the so called parliament for a period, and once that period has expired the “Bill” simply “Automatically” becomes Law to the power of Chapter 3 of the Constitution of Queensland 2001.
Technically, and perhaps a bit simplistic, Queensland at present has 3 Constitutions
(1) the 1867 Constitution (derogated)
(2) the Constitution of Queensland 2001 Chapters 1 and 2 (useless)
(3) the Constitution of Queensland 2001 Chapters 3 – 10 (power & glory).
Prepared June 2008
Pt 7. The QLD Constitution 2001 & the Removal of all Ownership Rights in QLD
What is Behind This
It is quite clear that those who have been put in power by the sovereign people of the State have, since 1992 when the original Acts were being framed, had a full intention in time, to bring about their own personal agendas, regardless of the wishes of the sovereign people who have, in good and open faith and intention, by secret ballot at elections, voted these people into positions of power and of trust and who must swear or affirm an oath of allegiance to Her Majesty that they will uphold Her laws for the benefit of the people of the State of QLD. That power has turned from the power granted by the people to the Legislative Assembly to make laws for 'peace welfare and good government' on behalf of the sovereign people of QLD using funds from taxes paid by the citizens of QLD and all of Australia, into a totalitarian system of Government, whereby we the people are subject to the corporation Government of the State.
The ramifications caused by these actions carried out over a long period of time by the Members of the body politic dating back as far as 1992 are so vast and wide spread it will take a long time to remedy and repair the whole system of government in QLD. The Parliament can make any laws they wish but I do not believe that under a democratic system of Government they are elected to Parliament to make draconian laws which remove the rights of the sovereign people to their use of their land without fair and just compensation.
Under the Constitution of Queensland 2001, by the removal of common law in the State of QLD, the public officials of this State can acquire an interest in private registered land without compensation, for the benefit of the State Government corporation. This also includes the property owned now and in the future as the sovereign people are in fact " an individual and a corporation" and therefore subject to the corporation Government of the State of QLD.
It is very clear from the time line of events that this was a well-planned manoeuvre to remove QLD from the Federation of Australia and through that action from the protection of the Australian Constitution and Common Law & Equity.
The former Premier said in the Second Reading Speech for the constitution, 'we all look forward to the day when we are a republic'. The people of the Commonwealth of Australia at referendum in 1999 voted against a republic but wished to retain the present system of Government with a clear separation of powers under common law and for the Commonwealth of Australia to remain exactly the same with a combined Federation of States as was created in 1901.
Mr Beattie also stated –
"But this Act is much more it is the fundamental law of QLD that underpins our system of government.
The entities it provides for include this Parliament, the Supreme and District Courts of this State and the system of local government that we know in QLD. The office holders under this Act include the Governor of QLD, the Ministers of the Crown and the judges of the Supreme and District Courts. This law is of supreme importance."
Further in the speech, the Premier stated "Our entity as a Sovereign State, the democratic ideals on which our State is built, rest on our Constitution".
Pt 1. The QLD Constitution 2001 & the Removal of all Ownership Rights in QLD
In order to bring about the structure now known as the State of QLD / Brigalow Corporation a long process of legal manipulation was instituted.
As the aim was to remove QLD from the Australian Federation, it was necessary to remove it back to the original QLD Constitution 1867, prior to Federation and make sure that Constitution was able to carry the intended results.
Consequently, this Constitution was reprinted but withheld for a date to be fixed, with 114 Changes, 131 Additions and 116 Deletions.
The most relevant change initially was the addition of over 14 sections regarding the expansion of the role of Parliamentary Secretary.
During the early 1990’s all major laws were reprinted, but held over for a fixed date.
On approx the 29 January 1998, the leader of the National Party placed on the table in Parliament, a document seeking to move the Governor of the State of QLD, into the Constitution Act 1867 as a parliamentary secretary and a public official. This was done under the Imperial Acts Application Act 1954 section 15DA.
This document was not challenged by any member of any party or any independent member of the QLD Parliament, and therefore became official on 29 January 1999. See Constitution (Parliamentary Secretaries) Act ©The State of QLD 1996.
On the same day the QLD Constitution 1867 reprint was proclaimed, thus verifiying the position of Parliamentary Secretary under its Constitution.
From this day on, the Governor of the State of QLD was no longer a sworn representative of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, but was now inside the 1867 Constitution, conducting the daily business of the government and allocating “laws” applicable to each government department. He was removed from his “no party allegiance” and had become, effectively, a part of the QLD government and under the Premier’s control.
On 9 November 2001, the Premier of the State of QLD, the Honorable Peter Beattie presented to Parliament the new Constitution of Queensland 2001 Bill.
The elected Members for the people of QLD, the Members of the Legislative Assembly, passed the Bill, said only to 'modernise' the Constitution of QLD.
This constitution was assented to by the Governor on 3rd December 2001 and upon assent, under section 95 of the new Constitution, Acts subject to the Constitution Act 1867 were repealed. Section 92 immediately came into force which repealed parts of the Constitution Act Amendment Act 1922. This allowed the Parliament to move back prior to the removal of the Legislative Council at referendum in 1922 and 'recreate' the positions of that former Legislative Council.
QLD then became, at the completion of these matters, without the assent of any of the laws by the Crown or Her Representative, an independent sovereign State and fractured the common law and the separation of powers in that state.
Although the Governor was clearly now a public servant under the current QLD State Government, he still held the Public Seal of the State, and sealed all documents signed under the Hand of the Sovereign with the Public Seal of the State, therefore rendering void, any contracts, Acts, Laws, etc under the Hand of the Sovereign.
In fact, on that day, 3 December 2001, the Governor of QLD with the authority of the Entrenched Provisions contained in the Constitution Act 1867 (Reprint No 1), and the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act which in their manner and form hold the entrenched provision of “The Governor of QLD”, and exercising the delegated authority of “The Crown”, did unilaterally ‘Assent’ to the ‘Constitution of Queensland Parliament of Queensland Bill’ without the consent of the People’s of QLD through the ultimate and absolute authority gained through a vote of ‘Referenda’.
And in doing so, this Constitution of Queensland 2001 became the ‘Fundamental Law of QLD.’
As the aim was to remove QLD from the Australian Federation, it was necessary to remove it back to the original QLD Constitution 1867, prior to Federation and make sure that Constitution was able to carry the intended results.
Consequently, this Constitution was reprinted but withheld for a date to be fixed, with 114 Changes, 131 Additions and 116 Deletions.
The most relevant change initially was the addition of over 14 sections regarding the expansion of the role of Parliamentary Secretary.
During the early 1990’s all major laws were reprinted, but held over for a fixed date.
On approx the 29 January 1998, the leader of the National Party placed on the table in Parliament, a document seeking to move the Governor of the State of QLD, into the Constitution Act 1867 as a parliamentary secretary and a public official. This was done under the Imperial Acts Application Act 1954 section 15DA.
This document was not challenged by any member of any party or any independent member of the QLD Parliament, and therefore became official on 29 January 1999. See Constitution (Parliamentary Secretaries) Act ©The State of QLD 1996.
On the same day the QLD Constitution 1867 reprint was proclaimed, thus verifiying the position of Parliamentary Secretary under its Constitution.
From this day on, the Governor of the State of QLD was no longer a sworn representative of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, but was now inside the 1867 Constitution, conducting the daily business of the government and allocating “laws” applicable to each government department. He was removed from his “no party allegiance” and had become, effectively, a part of the QLD government and under the Premier’s control.
On 9 November 2001, the Premier of the State of QLD, the Honorable Peter Beattie presented to Parliament the new Constitution of Queensland 2001 Bill.
The elected Members for the people of QLD, the Members of the Legislative Assembly, passed the Bill, said only to 'modernise' the Constitution of QLD.
This constitution was assented to by the Governor on 3rd December 2001 and upon assent, under section 95 of the new Constitution, Acts subject to the Constitution Act 1867 were repealed. Section 92 immediately came into force which repealed parts of the Constitution Act Amendment Act 1922. This allowed the Parliament to move back prior to the removal of the Legislative Council at referendum in 1922 and 'recreate' the positions of that former Legislative Council.
QLD then became, at the completion of these matters, without the assent of any of the laws by the Crown or Her Representative, an independent sovereign State and fractured the common law and the separation of powers in that state.
Although the Governor was clearly now a public servant under the current QLD State Government, he still held the Public Seal of the State, and sealed all documents signed under the Hand of the Sovereign with the Public Seal of the State, therefore rendering void, any contracts, Acts, Laws, etc under the Hand of the Sovereign.
In fact, on that day, 3 December 2001, the Governor of QLD with the authority of the Entrenched Provisions contained in the Constitution Act 1867 (Reprint No 1), and the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act which in their manner and form hold the entrenched provision of “The Governor of QLD”, and exercising the delegated authority of “The Crown”, did unilaterally ‘Assent’ to the ‘Constitution of Queensland Parliament of Queensland Bill’ without the consent of the People’s of QLD through the ultimate and absolute authority gained through a vote of ‘Referenda’.
And in doing so, this Constitution of Queensland 2001 became the ‘Fundamental Law of QLD.’
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
