Why this deception?
In 1973, Gough Whitlam authorized a Commission into Land Tenures, headed by Sir John Kerr.
This document of over 900 pages stated that the private land owner should not be allowed to benefit financially from government activities such as re-zoning. To prevent this, the owner should have his ownership rights regulated away, so that any zoning benefit would be offset by the loss of land use rights. The suggestion was made to buy all land back into Crown hands, but the authors recognized the cost factor would be too immense.
This document did not, at any stage, recognize the rights inherent in a Grant of Fee Simple.
The overall decision of this document was to completely regulate all aspects of land use, resume land where possible and allow major and chosen developers to develop specific areas. The individual could build a house on that land, with the right to sell it, but would never be allowed to own the land.
Gough Whitlam is widely recognized as the ‘leader’ of the Fabian Society in Australia.
This Society favours gradual incremental change rather than revolutionary change, tactics of harassment and attrition rather than head-on battles. They plan to create socialist states in Australia by promoting Marxist and Darwinist doctrines. Fabians favour the nationalization of land. They have stated, "We must make land common property.”
The Fabian Coat of Arms was originally a WOLF IN SHEEP’S CLOTHING.
Hawke & Rudd both looked to Whitlam as a mentor
Mr. Whitlam reiterated his contention to use section 96 of the Constitution as a means of "competing" with private enterprise. In effect this is the selective use of the government's power in the credit field to put free enterprise at a disadvantage to government "enterprise".
Mr. Hawke told his Fabian colleagues in Melbourne "For our reforms to endure, the whole mood and mind and attitudes of the nation must be permanently changed". This is an appeal for a programme of national social engineering.
He also said in that speech, "The Fabian Society acknowledges the principal tenet of Marxism, the abolition of private property, in this case to own land. They then align themselves with the non-violent arm of Marxism by accepting the non-violent road of patient gradualism to total government."
What Methods of Deception have brought about massive removal of land ownership rights?
· Council zoning
· Development applications
· Irrigators Water Buy-Backs
· Land Clearing Laws
· Native Animal Wildlife corridors
· State Parks
· Forest plantings
· Carbon emission taxes (proposed)
· Environmental laws
· Land care grants
· Native Vegetation laws
· Global Warming propaganda.
· And etc
While we may personally favour some of these measures, it is no longer a myth that they have all combined to remove our common law land ownership rights at a massive pace. 100’s of hours of personal research have led me to believe and state that all these regulations were not intended for the betterment of either the Australian Continent or the people who make it home.
Their one over-reaching aim was to take the land out of private ownership, lock it up, place the citizens in structured, regulated housing and create a form of communist control that is almost complete.
We are now seeing Whitlam’s plan in action. Farms being closed down for lack of water that they still pay for. People’s homes resumed and turned into park land, which is then leased to major corporations to be turned into resorts. Land resumed at basic costs, for public purposes, then sold to become housing estates.